EUR
FUNDAMENTAL BIAS: NEUTRAL
1. Monetary Policy
The ECB used the April meeting as a place holder meeting for the most part by not announcing any additional policy tweaks. The plans to phase out the APP into Q3 remained intact by reducing purchases from 40bln to 30bln in May and then down to 20bln in June. Markets were leaning towards a slightly more hawkish take from the bank (given recent inflation pressures), but the lack of conviction to remove the conditionality regarding the APP removal was seen as dovish. President Lagarde added to this dovish tone by explaining that Q3 has three months and IF the bank stops the APP, it could happen July, August or September. This was an important statement as the difference between a July and September end could mean the difference between a Q3 or Q4 rate hike. The president also added to the dovish tone by stressing that risks for the economic outlook are tilted to the downside and have recently intensified with geopolitical and virus-related challenges. When asked about policy normalization, the president made a strange comment by saying it is premature to think about monpol normalisation. As the bank is currently embarking on normalization this comment seemed out of place and reaffirmed the overall dovish take from the meeting. There were the usual sources releases after the presser which said policymakers see a July hike as still possible after Thursday's meeting, which provided some reprieve. With inflation >7% and growth slowing, the June meeting which accompanies staff economic projections will be critical for markets to solidify whether expectations of 1 or 2 hikes this year is correct or not.
2. Economic & Health Developments
Growth differentials still favour the US over EU capital flows, but differentials have turned positive against the UK. Given growing stagflation fears the ECB is in a tough spot, being forced to normalize policy to try and combat inflation but could as a result damage growth. Ongoing EU fiscal discussions to possibly allow ‘green bonds’ NOT to count against budget deficits remains in focus, alongside debt issuance for energy purchases. If approved, it will offer a flood of fiscal support which would be positive for the EUR and EU equities. Geopolitics The EUR pushed lower aggressively after initial geopolitical scares but have been trying to carve out a base. Proximity to the war and the impact of sanctions remains a risk if the situation deteriorates. With lots of negatives already priced, chasing lows on bad news is not as attractive as chasing the EUR higher on good news.
3. CFTC Analysis
Very bearish signal from recent positioning update as all three major categories saw sizeable net-short weekly changes yet again. The price action throughout the week has reflected this change in sentiment quite well. However, given how much bad news has been priced and recent hawkish comments, we could see some attractive opportunities on the long side of the EUR, but catalysts will be key.
4. The Week Ahead
Very light calendar week for the EUR next week with German ZEW data and ECB speak the main highlights. This week closed out with some very hawkish comments from ECB’s Villeroy (neutral) who talked up the possibility of hiking rates into positive territory by year-end and also noting that inflation expectations are becoming less and less anchored. His comments were very significant and the most hawkish than any of the other neutral members for the Governing Council. His comments do open up some possible upside for the EUR next week, especially if comments from President Lagarde starts to shift more to the hawkish side as well. As always, whatever happens to the USD will be important for the EUR which means US CPI data will be a key data point to watch for EUR price action. Apart from that, geopolitics will also be in focus as the EU tries to get an oil embargo over the table. The proposals presented so far has been unable to dent EUR sentiment on the negative side, mainly because a lot of bad news has already been priced into the EUR in recent weeks and months. The other risk to watch is Finland and Sweden’s plans to try and join NATO, which could spark retaliation from Russia, and is a serious risk to keep on the horizon as well.
GBP
FUNDAMENTAL BIAS: WEAK BEARISH
1. Monetary Policy
At their May meeting, the BoE delivered on expectations by raising the bank rate by 25bsp to 1.0%. There was an initial hawkish surprise as the vote split was 9-0 (no dissent from Cunliffe) and 3 of the 9 MPC members voted for a 50bsp move at the meeting. However, the hawkish reaction soon faded as it was also revealed that 2 of the 6 members who voted for a hike thought that this marked the end of the current hiking cycle. The dovishness didn’t stop there though as the BoE revised up their forecasts for peak inflation to >10% which added to the stagflation fears as the bank also saw possible GDP contraction in 2023. Furthermore, the bank took their first real stab at overly aggressive STIR pricing for the 2022 rate path by saying the current path would imply a big undershoot of their 2% inflation target in 2023 and was later backed up by Governor Bailey who said even though he thought rates should continue to rise he didn’t agree with those who think the MPC should be raising interest rates by a lot more. As the bank rate was raised to 1.0%, the markets expected some clarity from the bank on their plans to reduce the balance sheet. However, the bank decided to play for more time and said the bank will provide an update on their plans at the August meeting, pushing back expectations of active QT from Q2 to Q3. As a result of the overall dovish tone, Sterling fell to its lowest levels since 1Q21. The meeting confirmed market calls that the bank would look to hold rates steady after reaching 1.50%.
2. Economic & Health Developments
With inflation the main reason for the BoE’s recent rate hikes, there is a concern that the UK economy faces stagflation risk, as price pressures stay sticky while growth decelerates. That also means that current market expectations for rates continues to look too aggressive even after the BoE’s recent push back. This means downside risks for GBP if growth data push lower and/or the BoE continue to push their recent dovish tone.
3. Political Developments
Political uncertainty is usually GBP negative, so the PM’s future remains a risk. If distrust grows question remains on whether a no-confidence vote can happen (if so, short-term downside is likely), and whether he can survive the vote (a win should be GBP positive and a loss GBP negative). The Northern Ireland protocol remains a focus, with previous UK threats to trigger Article 16 and EU threats to terminate the Brexit deal if they do. Markets have rightly ignored this as posturing, but any actual escalation can see sharp GBP downside.
4. CFTC Analysis
Bearish signal from all 3 participant categories with aggregate positioning (large specs, leveraged funds & asset managers) still below 1 standard dev from the 15-year mean. Keep in mind that the CFTC data was updated until Tuesday 3 May which means the flush lower in Sterling following the BoE is not reflected in this data yet. With both price action and positioning looking stretched, we don’t want to chase GBP lower right now.
5. The Week Ahead
Very light calendar for the GBP apart from quarterly and monthly output data scheduled for Thursday. Based on the surprising jump in growth metrics in January the quarterly print is expected to print in positive territory, however the MM data for March are likely not going to be so lucky. Recall the recent dismal prints we saw for Retail Sales, Industrial Production and Consumer Confidence, which means MM growth is likely going to show a contraction in growth, or at the very least a number very close to 0%. Apart from growth data, the sensitivity to risk will also be in focus for the GBP, especially after the tumultuous past week for risk sentiment.
FUNDAMENTAL BIAS: NEUTRAL
1. Monetary Policy
The ECB used the April meeting as a place holder meeting for the most part by not announcing any additional policy tweaks. The plans to phase out the APP into Q3 remained intact by reducing purchases from 40bln to 30bln in May and then down to 20bln in June. Markets were leaning towards a slightly more hawkish take from the bank (given recent inflation pressures), but the lack of conviction to remove the conditionality regarding the APP removal was seen as dovish. President Lagarde added to this dovish tone by explaining that Q3 has three months and IF the bank stops the APP, it could happen July, August or September. This was an important statement as the difference between a July and September end could mean the difference between a Q3 or Q4 rate hike. The president also added to the dovish tone by stressing that risks for the economic outlook are tilted to the downside and have recently intensified with geopolitical and virus-related challenges. When asked about policy normalization, the president made a strange comment by saying it is premature to think about monpol normalisation. As the bank is currently embarking on normalization this comment seemed out of place and reaffirmed the overall dovish take from the meeting. There were the usual sources releases after the presser which said policymakers see a July hike as still possible after Thursday's meeting, which provided some reprieve. With inflation >7% and growth slowing, the June meeting which accompanies staff economic projections will be critical for markets to solidify whether expectations of 1 or 2 hikes this year is correct or not.
2. Economic & Health Developments
Growth differentials still favour the US over EU capital flows, but differentials have turned positive against the UK. Given growing stagflation fears the ECB is in a tough spot, being forced to normalize policy to try and combat inflation but could as a result damage growth. Ongoing EU fiscal discussions to possibly allow ‘green bonds’ NOT to count against budget deficits remains in focus, alongside debt issuance for energy purchases. If approved, it will offer a flood of fiscal support which would be positive for the EUR and EU equities. Geopolitics The EUR pushed lower aggressively after initial geopolitical scares but have been trying to carve out a base. Proximity to the war and the impact of sanctions remains a risk if the situation deteriorates. With lots of negatives already priced, chasing lows on bad news is not as attractive as chasing the EUR higher on good news.
3. CFTC Analysis
Very bearish signal from recent positioning update as all three major categories saw sizeable net-short weekly changes yet again. The price action throughout the week has reflected this change in sentiment quite well. However, given how much bad news has been priced and recent hawkish comments, we could see some attractive opportunities on the long side of the EUR, but catalysts will be key.
4. The Week Ahead
Very light calendar week for the EUR next week with German ZEW data and ECB speak the main highlights. This week closed out with some very hawkish comments from ECB’s Villeroy (neutral) who talked up the possibility of hiking rates into positive territory by year-end and also noting that inflation expectations are becoming less and less anchored. His comments were very significant and the most hawkish than any of the other neutral members for the Governing Council. His comments do open up some possible upside for the EUR next week, especially if comments from President Lagarde starts to shift more to the hawkish side as well. As always, whatever happens to the USD will be important for the EUR which means US CPI data will be a key data point to watch for EUR price action. Apart from that, geopolitics will also be in focus as the EU tries to get an oil embargo over the table. The proposals presented so far has been unable to dent EUR sentiment on the negative side, mainly because a lot of bad news has already been priced into the EUR in recent weeks and months. The other risk to watch is Finland and Sweden’s plans to try and join NATO, which could spark retaliation from Russia, and is a serious risk to keep on the horizon as well.
GBP
FUNDAMENTAL BIAS: WEAK BEARISH
1. Monetary Policy
At their May meeting, the BoE delivered on expectations by raising the bank rate by 25bsp to 1.0%. There was an initial hawkish surprise as the vote split was 9-0 (no dissent from Cunliffe) and 3 of the 9 MPC members voted for a 50bsp move at the meeting. However, the hawkish reaction soon faded as it was also revealed that 2 of the 6 members who voted for a hike thought that this marked the end of the current hiking cycle. The dovishness didn’t stop there though as the BoE revised up their forecasts for peak inflation to >10% which added to the stagflation fears as the bank also saw possible GDP contraction in 2023. Furthermore, the bank took their first real stab at overly aggressive STIR pricing for the 2022 rate path by saying the current path would imply a big undershoot of their 2% inflation target in 2023 and was later backed up by Governor Bailey who said even though he thought rates should continue to rise he didn’t agree with those who think the MPC should be raising interest rates by a lot more. As the bank rate was raised to 1.0%, the markets expected some clarity from the bank on their plans to reduce the balance sheet. However, the bank decided to play for more time and said the bank will provide an update on their plans at the August meeting, pushing back expectations of active QT from Q2 to Q3. As a result of the overall dovish tone, Sterling fell to its lowest levels since 1Q21. The meeting confirmed market calls that the bank would look to hold rates steady after reaching 1.50%.
2. Economic & Health Developments
With inflation the main reason for the BoE’s recent rate hikes, there is a concern that the UK economy faces stagflation risk, as price pressures stay sticky while growth decelerates. That also means that current market expectations for rates continues to look too aggressive even after the BoE’s recent push back. This means downside risks for GBP if growth data push lower and/or the BoE continue to push their recent dovish tone.
3. Political Developments
Political uncertainty is usually GBP negative, so the PM’s future remains a risk. If distrust grows question remains on whether a no-confidence vote can happen (if so, short-term downside is likely), and whether he can survive the vote (a win should be GBP positive and a loss GBP negative). The Northern Ireland protocol remains a focus, with previous UK threats to trigger Article 16 and EU threats to terminate the Brexit deal if they do. Markets have rightly ignored this as posturing, but any actual escalation can see sharp GBP downside.
4. CFTC Analysis
Bearish signal from all 3 participant categories with aggregate positioning (large specs, leveraged funds & asset managers) still below 1 standard dev from the 15-year mean. Keep in mind that the CFTC data was updated until Tuesday 3 May which means the flush lower in Sterling following the BoE is not reflected in this data yet. With both price action and positioning looking stretched, we don’t want to chase GBP lower right now.
5. The Week Ahead
Very light calendar for the GBP apart from quarterly and monthly output data scheduled for Thursday. Based on the surprising jump in growth metrics in January the quarterly print is expected to print in positive territory, however the MM data for March are likely not going to be so lucky. Recall the recent dismal prints we saw for Retail Sales, Industrial Production and Consumer Confidence, which means MM growth is likely going to show a contraction in growth, or at the very least a number very close to 0%. Apart from growth data, the sensitivity to risk will also be in focus for the GBP, especially after the tumultuous past week for risk sentiment.
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.