Get started

Smartflow

Impulse without purpose? Not in Smart Money termsSOL didn’t just break structure — it filled inefficiency and positioned above. Now price is sitting in the upper FVG, where decisions are made — not guesses. What just happened: Price rallied from the OB below and left an IFVG in its wake Current price is hovering at the edge of a higher FVG, right where liquidity rests from trapped shorts The move is complete — now it’s about what price does next in this zone of intent From here, two paths: Sweep into FVG, reject, and rotate back down toward the 154–147.4 range React bullishly from mid-FVG, reclaim structure → break to new internal high and keep running The OB down at 145 is still valid if price unwinds — that’s where Smart Money bids. Execution view: Rejection from 158–159 = short bias down to 147–145 Clean invalidation above FVG high If price consolidates at 154 and reclaims → setup flips bullish The setup isn’t about what price did — it’s about what it’s preparing for. You want more trades like this — precision zones, mapped logic — check the profile description.
by SmartFlowsI
That wasn’t a breakout. That was the stop runBTC swept the high into 107,991 — precision tap of the premium fib. Now the delivery shifts. Price has already done its job: take liquidity, trigger late longs, and set up the real move. Here’s the execution breakdown: Price tagged the 0 level of the fib extension — 107,991 — and rejected A clean 4H FVG sits just below around 106,195.9 (0.5), aligned with 0.382 and 0.618 fib levels (106,619.8 to 105,772.1) This is the re-entry zone for Smart Money — not the top chasers Expectations from here: → Rebalance into the 106.6–105.7k region → If that zone holds and price shifts structure bullish again, we retest 107.1 → 107.9 → break higher → If we lose 105.7 cleanly, I’m watching 104,399.9 — the deeper inefficiency magnet This isn’t about confirmation. It’s about preparation. More trades like this — clean, controlled, conviction-based — live in the profile description.
by SmartFlowsI
ETH didn’t rally — it cleared inefficiency and pausedThis isn’t the move. This is the setup for the move. ETH tagged 2658.22 — premium — and stalled right where Smart Money pauses before redistributing or rotating. Here’s how this lines up: Price swept into the 0 fib (2658.22), then hesitated — that’s not weakness, that’s precision Just below sits a clean FVG at 2594–2575, right between the 0.382–0.5 fibs Below that: OB near 2527–2492 — last line of defense before momentum flips Right now, ETH is offering a reactive pullback opportunity. If bulls hold 2594–2575 with a bounce, we rotate higher again. But if they don’t — 2527 becomes the decision zone. Execution lens: Ideal re-entry zone: 2594–2575 Invalidation: sustained close below 2555 = expect OB tap If FVG holds, expect revisit of 2658 → extension toward 2680s This setup isn’t done. It’s developing. Wait for price to speak — not hope. For more plays built like this — mapped in advance, not after the fact — check the profile description
by SmartFlowsI
This isn’t a dump. It’s a delivery systemBNB sold off fast — but not irrationally. Look closer, and you’ll see the system at work: rejection from inefficiency, compression, and now a retest of where the last real buyers were found. The structure: Price swept short-term demand and wicked below local range lows with a high-volume rejection. That low was engineered — not failed. Above us? A neatly layered series of 60-minute FVGs from 646.5 to 652.0. Every candle into that zone is a test. But the true objective is to reload short once that imbalance is filled. Playbook: We’re in a reactive zone now. Here’s what I’m watching: Price pushes into the FVG cluster (646–650) Volume dries → rejection wick → return to discounted re-entry Aggressive scalpers might long the bounce into the FVG, but the higher-probability play is fading the inefficiency once it’s filled. Execution: Scalp long (optional): 643.5 → TP into 648–650 Main setup: short entry from 647.4–650.5 SL above 652.2 TP1: 640.5 TP2: 634.8 Final draw: 630.0 if structure accelerates Patience is what separates the move from the moment. Final thought: “This move didn’t break structure. It exposed the next one.”
by SmartFlowst
Everyone saw the drop. I saw the gapPrice nuked — but it didn’t break structure. It filled imbalance, paused, and now it's reloading beneath a stack of untouched FVGs. This isn't capitulation. It's orchestration. The setup: We’ve got layered 60-minute FVGs stacked from 0.61 to 0.66. That’s the destination — not the mystery. What matters is the origin. The rejection block around 0.58–0.59 has held clean, and we now have two bullish rejection wicks off that base. Volume surged during the sweep — and fell on the retrace. That’s not distribution. That’s Smart Money filling. Two entries — one outcome: Entry 1: Tap into the red demand zone, wick the 0.58–0.579 region Entry 2: Break and retest above minor FVG (0.60 reclaim confirmation) Either way, the draw is the inefficiency stack above. Execution Map: Long from 0.579–0.583 SL: Below the base at 0.574 TP1: 0.615 (lower FVG) TP2: 0.645 (full sweep) Final: 0.660 liquidity run Don’t fear the compression. That’s where the trap is set. Final thought: “Most traders fear price going sideways. I see it as silence before the algorithm speaks.”
by SmartFlowst
The FVG above isn’t the target. It’s the bait.This is a classic Smart Money sequence. Most are watching the imbalance at 106.5k–108.7k and expecting immediate delivery. But that’s not how this game works. The setup: Price broke down violently, then reversed with momentum — stopping right beneath the daily FVG block. That alone tells me it’s not ready. It’s gathering. Below? Multiple fib levels that haven’t been tested — 104.4k (0.236), 102.6k (0.0), and a volume-backed rejection wick that still holds weight. The market is likely to dip again — pull into deeper discount, reset the low timeframe narrative — and only then attack the FVG and upper sweep zones. What I expect: Sweep of 102.6k (final liquidity run) Reaction → reclaim 104.4k Push into the FVG toward 106.5k (0.5) and possibly 107.4k (0.618) No emotional reaction to the red candles — this is structure playing out, not weakness unfolding. Plan: Ideal Entry: 102.8k–103.2k range SL: Below 102.6k TP1: 105.6k TP2: 107.4k Final: 108.7k clean inefficiency fill Let it dip. Let it breathe. That’s where conviction is built. Final thought: “The real move starts when they convince you it’s done.”
by SmartFlowst
When the range compresses, the breakout doesn’t ask — it takesThis isn’t a chop. It’s a setup. AVAX just printed the kind of consolidation Smart Money wants to see before delivery. The setup: After the impulsive drop, price carved out a micro-range with well-defined boundaries — compression structure nested inside inefficiency. The FVG above (marked in purple) hasn’t been mitigated, and price is now pressing upward into that void with rising volume. But that’s not where the trade is. The real trade is in the retracement. I’m watching for one of two entries: Either we drive into the FVG first, then sweep back into the range floor to trap late longs Or we sweep range low one more time, then rip straight into the imbalance Either way, the invalidation is clean — below the swing low, under 18.66. Execution plan: Entry: 18.70–18.90 zone (post-sweep or reaction) TP1: 19.80 fill (FVG midpoint) TP2: 20.54 clean inefficiency clearance Nothing about this is forced. Price is telling the story. I’m just listening. Final thought: “The range isn’t random. It’s the disguise Smart Money uses before they move size.”
by SmartFlowst
Compression, rejection, and the trap belowPEPE isn’t random here — it’s in a calculated drawdown. Not a dump — a design. What looks like weakness is really compression into a reactive pocket. The logic: Price is descending inside a compression channel. But the real interest lies lower — specifically around the FVG and the untouched demand range down to 0.0000089. That’s the key. The 0.0000103 zone is a surface-level fib level (0.382), but the deeper intention is beneath it — where Smart Money will want to accumulate before running it back into inefficiency. Above us? There’s a massive void sitting between 0.0000115 and 0.0000126. That’s the draw — but not before a deeper sweep to fuel it. Two key paths: Ideal: Full sweep of 0.0000089 demand → strong reversal → drive back into the .5/.618 fib cluster near 0.0000115–0.0000126 If front-run: Hold near current level (0.0000103) and deliver into the FVG gap above Anything below 0.0000083? That’s your invalidation. Until then, compression is the setup. Final thought: “Smart Money doesn’t chase the wick. It sets the trap — then steps in with size.”
by SmartFlowst