QBTS Price reacted constructively from the mid-term support mentioned in my June 30th update. As long as price holds above 14.5, I favor upside momentum to continue with potential to re-test the May highs and advance toward the next macro resistance zones at 23–28 and 30–32.
QBTS AS long as it stays above $15, we will be alright. It’s not going to pump over night however patience is the ticket. We will be back to $18 in a month, you’ll see.
QBTS If you believe D-Waves 61 scientist that they achieved "Quantum Advantage", as I do, it's Advantage II is the early leader in functional cost effective Qbit computing.
When you look at the FREEZE Qbit solution or approach, it is expensive and complex. Using liquid nitrogen to see through the chafe or noise as the call it, makes no practical sense. Back in the day (1993) Cray super computers utilized liquid nitrogen and a none conductive fluid to keep their chips cool. I use to maintain them for NSA. We ran them close together in parallel to break encryption or for scientific projects.
Move forward to 1998 and newer chips air cooled whooped Cray's "super computers butt". All Technology has simple solutions once trial and error process begins. NVIDIA is selling power hungry chips that they or someone else will replace with a chip utilizing less power, cooling, and greater speed.
D-Wave needs to continue development to reduce power and improve noise filtration. AI will help immensely in all aspects of R&D. Google & IBM all tested D-Waves product, if you noticed they didn't come out and refute D-Waves claims, interesting, yes? Freezing Qubits today is more accurate, but I do not believe slowing Qubits down is the answer long term. Building Q compute in space is also not the answer.
D-Wave's approach primarily focuses on physical qubits. They use super conductors. IonQ utilizes physical qubits, logical qubits, and topological qubits in its quantum computing systems.
D-Wave is mastering the physical qubit which all qubit compute utilize. Everyone else is attempting to use logical and theoretical qubits to filter or provide encoding to filter errors. Error detection!
D-waves quantum annealing is the future, can D-wave solve physical qubit availability. I am sure it's just a matter of time.
QBTS I do not know what to expect Sunday Night/Monday, I do not like being in as many stocks as Im with this news hitting on the weekend. That being said, in this kind of environment, once the selling cools down, extreme growth is where you want to be in order match inflation, so IF any of the"4" quants are going to work there is no such thing as baggage BUT, people need to understand what they are putting their money in and respect their tap out points, this is still SPEC TECH AND QBTS is going against the grain with its Annealing system, it could be the 100% winner or it could take a blow, maybe even bankrupt them, if they the industry it self decides Gate systems are the way to go and they cant razzle dazzle quick enough OR sub zero temps are a no go for deployment. They are American tech trying to sell to world governements that could absolutely use the tech they have BUT if there is some sort of revenge tax on tech services, QBTS and a lot of other SPEC Tech will be hurt
QBTS good day for shorties. selling was relentless. Lots of tariffs heading at QBTS "top" clients. I reallllly hope that wasn't other countries saying eff this and we will develop our own. need a trend break to re enter.